How to show the International Trade … Not!
Innovative, maybe - but it's inaccurate - and you have no idea, when you see this tangled web
The judges at the Society of News Design 31 spotted a widespread trend in the many submissions from this year and even gave it a name: BARN = Big-Ass Red Numbers
I think this trend has been underway for quite a few years. I still remember the way The Guardian made their 9/11 - graphic coverage. BARN’s all over. Maybe someone have even earlier examples?
Judging from the many examples in the competition this year however, it could be just the right time to start thinking, if we are getting close to an overused cliché rather than a trend.
Do we really need all these numbers enlarged like this? In my own opinion I could see the use of BARN’s or just BAN’s (the colour isn’t important) going down quite a lot without me missing them.
Not adding to the understanding
When numbers are enlarged like this, I think most readers disconnects them from the story - they act as a visual element (that’s why designers love them) rather than as part of the story. They are just an easy way to get some contrast on the page -making the whole thing look prettier, but not adding to the understanding.
Do we need to ban the BANs?
Mark Friesen made a collection of the examples he could find at the SND 31 -competition:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Please use the secure 'Connect with Facebook'-button in the sidebar

Thomas Molén went ahead and made a very clean and elegant online-graphic, where you can see who voted for who in the European Song Contest

Innovative, maybe - but it’s inaccurate - and you have no idea, when you see this tangled web

It’s not personal taste - it is science, cognitive psychology, that tells us that the brain can’t handle overly complex graphics

The graph visualizing the Ebb and Flow of Movies 1986-2008 was awarded Best of Show/Peter Sullivan Award

Judges decided to seek out only the truly perfect graphics - and not to argue too much about the medals