Malofiej-week is here

What is the best way to facilitate a discussion on a website like VisualJournalism? To be honest, I haven't figured it out yet. Lots of possibilities and they all promise to be really simple and work like a charm. I have now decided to go with the disqus-system instead of the facebook-connect. That way you'll have more options to log in with existing accounts. Also - I'm working to get a few more updates on the site each day. Follow this place closely for the next week and get the usual 80% of your infographics news - Gert K Nielsen, Admin

- 80% of the news in infographics …

The Death of Datavisualization in the News


Good news from the biggest infographic conference this year: Datavisualizations as a journalistic end-result has taken a fatal blow and will most likely be gone by the next few years.

Datavisualization doesn’t tell the story
The reason is simple: Dataviz is for research. It doesn’t tell the story on its own. It never worked, but it took a few years to come to this understanding.

If the researcher works as a journalist, he can use dataviz to dig up a story. That story has to be told with other means than just publishing your research-material and call it an infographic.

Dataviz is a means to an end – not an end in itself.

You saw this clear trend in the awarded material and you heard it from many professional in the room: When you work in the news with journalistic storytelling you bloody well start tell these stories, rather than presenting a huge dataset to the reader and ask them to do your work.

No longer will it be enough to execute graphics with a certain wow-factor and then hope for the best. You need to be sure, that you have a story to tell. We’re taking back responsibility for the visual experience and will try to avoid all the arbitrary connections and untrue stories, that readers have been fooled into seeing in the presented data-sets.

Linear storytelling awarded ‘Best of Show’
Joe Ward from the New York Times spoke of the process of making the online-graphic about the great pitcher Mariano Rivera. How they decided against publishing graphically all the data for the users to play around with and instead went for the linear storytelling with heavy use of graphics. That exact entry was later awarded ‘Best of Show’.

So should data-wizards start looking for another job then? Absolutely not. Data-driven journalism is still in its infancy – and I really believe, that a lot of good stories are hiding in the data. It will take datavisualizers to help dig these stories out of the data and it will take datavisualizers to present the findings (not the entire dataset) as well-executed infographics.

The Saviour of Datavisualizations
This will in turn end out as being The Saviour of Datavisualizations in the news. When readers suddenly start to realize that visualizations actually has a story to tell – insights to deliver – they’ll start spend more time and effort than ever with dataviz. Instead of duping your readers, you’ll be serving your readers.

It will still take some hard work from infographic people with a journalistic instinct to keep fencing away the meaningless visual plots, but we’re on track now. This year’s Malofiej was the proof, that we’re winning the fight, and I wouldn’t count on too many dataset-visualizations in the award-show for next year.

  • Pingback: ANDRE

  • Pingback: The Death of Datavisualization in the News – VisualJournalism | VisualPoint | Scoop.it

  • Pingback: DAN

  • Pingback: GORDON

  • Pingback: BARRY

  • Pingback: IVAN

  • Pingback: KIRK

  • Pingback: BILLY

  • Pingback: FREDDIE

  • Pingback: KEVIN

  • Pingback: HOWARD

  • Pingback: FREDERICK

  • Pingback: LESLIE

  • Pingback: DERRICK

  • Pingback: AUSTIN

  • Pingback: TRAVIS

  • Pingback: KENNETH

  • Pingback: BRYAN

  • Pingback: ANTONIO

  • Pingback: CHRIS

  • Pingback: MILTON

  • Pingback: STUART

  • Pingback: ALEXANDER

  • Pingback: TODD

  • Pingback: TRAVIS

  • Pingback: ALBERT

  • Pingback: GREG

  • Pingback: RONNIE

  • Pingback: RAY

  • Pingback: DALE

  • Pingback: FRANCIS

  • Pingback: BILLY

  • Pingback: ROGER

  • Pingback: LEON

  • Pingback: JESUS

  • Pingback: RALPH

  • Pingback: FREDDIE

  • Pingback: EDWIN

  • Pingback: DUSTIN

  • Pingback: MARION

  • Anonymous

    I couldn’t agree more. How did this trend of data visualisation ever occur in the first place? What are its origins? I’ve never been a fan and felt like an outsider for a couple of years as papers jumped onto this wholly untried and untested trend. I wasn’t allowed to not like them. It wasn’t “cool” to do so. They might look nice but you need a hell of a lot of patience to be bothered to get the facts out of them. Most readers, I suspect, don’t spend that amount of time sifting through the data. That’s not their job. It’t ours.

  • http://twitter.com/MarianSteinbach Marian Steinbach

    Gert, did you mean “News” (as in the headline) or “Journalism” as a whole (as the rest of the article implies)?

    I’m asking because I don’t see a lot of data visualization in the News. And that might be for good reasons. News are fast. Datavis (creation and reception) often takes time. We are glad when we find a good example for a bar chart depicting the month’s unemployment rates.

    If you talk about journalism as a whole and you’re saying that data visualization won’t be a part of journalism in the future, then I think you have a very narrow understanding of journalism. Philipp Roberts mentioned it: Some have already begun to augment journalism by publishing complete data sets, with or without visualization. Making pictures out of it (be it still, animated or interactive) is only one way to make use of that data. In fact The Guardian leverages the growing willingness of the end users to engage in the storytelling and fact finding themselves. They – your customers – can reuse that data in purposes the journalists don’t necessarily think of.

    I think that journalism has to change, and so it does. Journalists have to be more open about their sources, because end users want to check them. Publishing raw data in a digestible way is not storytelling, but it is part of a more transparent journalism.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1040309986 David Alameda Bernal

    Maybe it sounds bad, but… do we need a conference to discover it (‘datavisualization doesn’t tell the story’)? Funny. Our business is about news, not only numbers.

  • Gert K Nielsen

    ‘Screaming titles’ are part of online journalism. And like all good journalism they have emotional impact. Curiosity / Desire / Disgust. I like it that way. And I’ll leave the ‘Silent titles’ for scientific papers.

  • http://marciapiede.blogspot.com/ simone

    i wish i could see the death of those screaming titles instead.

  • http://twitter.com/PhilDRoberts Philip Roberts

    “Dataviz is a means to an end – not an end in itself.”
    I totally agree with this. Too often people think that once you have created a visualisation then that is the end of the story. This is not true, data visualisations need to be interpreted correctly, they are part of a story not the story itself.
    I however would like to see more releases of the entire datasets so that others can use the data to create stories that the journalists/data creators had never thought of. The Guardian (UK) is leading the way in opening up the data that it uses in its stories for usage in the DataBlog, by releasing it on Google Docs or Fusion Tables.

  • Gert K Nielsen

    @Max – it would be great to see a infographics video-category (or perhaps no categories at all, which could also make room for video). I believe the Dutch IC-event has just done that with their animated infographics category.

    @Geoff – You’re right about my response. It’s not news – but I agree that it has a place somewhere else – especially scientific or even journalistic research.

    @Michael I agree with a lot of what you say. And isn’t it sad to realize that the dataviz had a good time, because it was so easy to publish the work of other professionals (statisticians) and get something pretty with no drawingskills.

  • http://www.facebook.com/prof.michael.stoll Prof. Michael Stoll

    DataViz is a tricky field. As some of the terms are in this field. So it’s an easy thing to comare DataViz with classical charts, that are data visualizations – just with small amounts of data. huh …

    Wether DataVis tells a story or not, depends deeply on the literacy of the person looking at it. So an archaeologist can read a lot from some bones “lying around in an desert”. I cannot.

    There was an excellent talk of Sean McNaughton from the NGM at Malofiej a few years ago about excactly how to rebuild a story from visual obstacles (http://www.flickr.com/photos/mstoll/2332956556/).

    You are right, Gert, that DataViz – as we know it today – will be dead soon. As early forms in print infographics disappeared soon after their introduction. Just skim through early SND- or Malofiej-books.

    But DataViz will develop further and as in real life too, not every story is presented to us on a silver tablet, but we rather have to interact, to look, to explore … to get it.

    My concerns about todays DataViz are, that it takes an overproportional amount of attention in the news, because

    1. it emerges from a very well researched field: statistics
    2. there are more or less easy to use visualizaton-tools around
    3. no in-depth drawing-skills are needed
    4. the outcome often looks pretty

    Alberto Cairo often states exploring (data) information to be important. For good reasons: Actively thinking about stuff (that is exploration) supports learning and knowledge.

    So for me, the future of DataViz is, where we as users will get tools at hand, that enable us to explore data by adjusting the amount and granularity according to our capabilities, abilities and interests.

  • http://twitter.com/mcgeoff Geoff McGhee

    Not so fast, Gert. I realize that everybody likes the idea of infographics as data-plus-value-added, but I think that increasingly real-time data is going to require just the interactive data visualizations you’ve written off. Tell me that real-time traffic in Google Maps needs an analysis layer? Ok, you respond, that’s not news. But I think there are similar applications that will be, whether it’s unemployment figures, disease outbreaks etc.

    Not all data vis is exploratory, some is explanatory. If you’re saying that adding an intro and explanatory text makes it an infographic, then you’re just playing with semantics.

    Good, stimulating post though.

  • http://twitter.com/maxgadney maxgadney

    this is interesting gert – will there be a category for videography in next year’s show? there are some fantastic linear tellings of news – TV/video designers have been doing this for a while – while people were trying to save print with complexity, video graphics have been spreading throughout the web – ill do a post on this soon – but good points, well made